|
How should this lawyer have resolved the problem? Let's examine this. A head of the family is detained under the Public Safety Act. A report comes up that his family is starving. On November 28, 2010, a report reveals non-resident Kashmiri from outside kashmir donated 50,000 to starving Nowhatta family. The sum was handed over to the family by an advocate. A statement was issued. It is ironic that nobody from Kashmir lent a helping hand to the family. Is it ironic that nobody from Kashmir lent a helping hand to the family or that the state administration lacks the skills and knowledge of economy and budget, and failed to protect the rights of specific individual or individuals? Answer is obvious; the state administration lacks skills and knowledge of economy and budget, and failed to protect the rights of specific individual or individuals. Does transferring money from outside the state enhance economy and budget, and protect the rights? No, it does not. No money transfer Do we need adequate products and services in essential ingredients of economy per person for survival or money? We need products and services in essential ingredients of economy per person for survival. The system has to be configured properly so that everyone gets his/her adequate quota. Why should money transfer from outside or within the state be banned? Does transferring money from outside the state resolve the problem? No, it does not. The system has to be configured properly so that everyone gets his/her adequate quota. Why was this family on the verge of starvation? What was the state administration doing? What services, skills, and knowledge should the state administration have? Do we need an administration that does not know about economy and budget, and how to protect the rights of individual or individuals? No, we do not. We need a civilized, competent administration. Is it always essential that all people in the state should work every day in the field, on-site, or other locations? What is this family actually facing? Failure to provide necessities by the state administration. Deprivation of rights under the color of law. How should this lawyer have resolved the problem? He or she should have filed a complaint for failure to provide necessities by state administration, deprivation of rights under the color of law, and discrimination. The state system has to take care of all the needs of people. This guidance is for those serving public. Does this prove a lack of skills and knowledge of economy, budget, and rights by people managing the state? Yes, it does. Does this prove the collapse of the existing administration? Yes, it does. Should there be a caretaker administration? Yes, there should be. |